Combatting Illegal Mining with CiiMS: Strengthening Security and Intelligence Across Africa’s Mining Sector
- Jeanné Du Plooy
- 16 hours ago
- 21 min read
Updated: 3 hours ago
Illegal mining has become one of Africa’s most persistent challenges, from small-scale artisanal mining activity into organised networks that operate across borders. In South Africa, the issue runs deep. With current news from across Africa, all eyes are on the problem and what governments and private sectors plan to do to combat this crisis.

The Buffelsfontein Mine incident of January 2025, where at least 78 miners died after months trapped underground, served as a wake-up call for South Africa’s mining sector and has placed illegal mining under intense global scrutiny. It exposed both the desperation that drives people to risk their lives in abandoned shafts and the criminal networks that profit from their labour. What began as informal artisanal mining has now evolved into a deeply entrenched underground economy that drains revenue from legitimate operators, threatens human life and destabilises mining communities across the country.
As Africa’s mining sector continues to face theft, smuggling and violent incursions, traditional security methods are no longer enough. The scale and complexity of illegal mining now demand intelligence-led, technology-driven systems that transform fragmented data into actionable insight. The CiiMS Platform meets this demand by integrating incident reporting, analytics and coordinated response into a single ecosystem that helps mines identify patterns, manage risks and take decisive action against illegal mining.
This article unpacks the forces that gave rise to illegal mining, its renewed prominence in the media, and the complex consequences it carries for economies, ecosystems, and community stability across Africa.
Illegal mining is not isolated to one country, mineral or tactic. It has evolved into a beast with large and far-reaching claws. Ending illegal mining begins with intelligence. By using platforms like CiiMS to turn raw data into actionable insight, the mining sector can expose weak points in these networks and strike at the soft underbelly of the crisis itself.
As the article unpacks these challenges, it will also show how the CiiMS Platform and Signal Tower provide the intelligence, reporting and real-time monitoring capabilities needed to combat illegal mining. Connecting the evolving risks in Africa’s mining sector with the tools that enable mines to strengthen security, improve visibility and respond proactively across high-risk environments.
Zama Zamas, Galamseys and Orpailleurs: The Language of Africa’s Illegal Mining
Illegal mining has arguably existed for as long as legal mining has. As operations evolve, so do criminal tactics. The issue has become so embedded within communities that different regions have developed their own names for the individuals and syndicates involved. These terms now appear regularly in news reports and public discourse, underscoring how deeply the phenomenon has taken root by influencing economies, societies and even local language.
In South Africa, illegal miners have earned the name: Zama Zamas, a term derived from the isiZulu word ukuzama, literally meaning “to try” or “those who take a chance.” The term Zama Zamas is also often equated to the English word “hustlers”. While the naming convention is South African, the individuals involved are often also from neighbouring countries looking for a means of income:
· Lesotho
· Mozambique
· Zimbabwe (here they are referred to as Makorokoza – “panners” in Shona)
· Eswatini
· Malawi
· Zambia
This underscores the ongoing border control issues and undocumented migrants in South Africa. The South African government has repeatedly expressed concern about the porous nature of our borders, noting that illegal mining syndicates exploit weak points in cross-border movement to traffic people, weapons, explosives and minerals.
In Ghana, they have been coined: Galamseyers/Galamseys with origins in West African Pidgin English or a blend of English and Creole, a trade dialect that developed during the colonial gold rush era. Over time this was blended from the phonetics of “gather them and sell”.
In Francophone African countries such as Mali, Niger, and Chad, artisanal miners are commonly known as Orpailleurs, a French term that literally means “gold panner” or “gold prospector”. The word reflects the surface-level, alluvial nature of much of West Africa’s artisanal gold mining, where miners sift river sediments or shallow soil deposits in search of gold.
This same style of illegal mining is used in Sudan, where the colloquial label for illegal miners is derived from the Arabic for “gold seekers”.
In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which also has French as an official language, the term Creuseurs is used instead, meaning “diggers”. This distinction is more than linguistic, reflecting the different characteristics and modus operandi of illegal mining by region.
While Orpailleurs in West Africa typically work shallow sites and riverbeds, Creuseurs in the DRC often operate in deep, dangerous pits to extract cobalt, coltan and other critical minerals vital to global supply chains.
In Western publications you may also see these activities referred to as “Wildcat Mining”, a term popularised during 19th century American mining and oil explorations, where wildcatters drilled speculative oil wells or prospected in remote areas with little oversight, often “where only wildcats roamed.”
This helps their readers quickly understand the term as it is related to ventures started without official approval, permits or geological certainty. Essentially, risky or speculative operations done outside the boundaries of the law. While the term conveys adventure and risk, it also highlights the regulatory blind spots that allow such operations to thrive, and the major challenges posed for security management, environmental protection and formal-sector stability.
These cases illustrate the fragmented, high-risk environments in which artisanal and illegal mining thrive. They also highlight the need for integrated reporting and intelligence systems such as CiiMS, which can enhance traceability, monitor incidents and strengthen oversight across dispersed or informal mining zones.
When paired with Signal Tower’s real-time alerting and critical event monitoring, operators gain both the historical intelligence and the immediate situational awareness required to respond effectively to fast-moving threats.
Known by many names and tactics across the continent, illegal mining’s varied forms reveal why legal definitions and enforcement often struggle to keep pace with its rapid evolution.
The Definition of Illegal Mining Under South African Law
According to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, illegal mining is not explicitly defined as a standalone term but is addressed under Section 5A: “Prohibition relating to illegal act.”
This section states that:
“No person may prospect for or remove, mine, conduct technical co-operation operations, reconnaissance operations, explore for or produce any mineral or petroleum, or commence with any work incidental thereto on any area without—(a) an environmental authorisation;(b) a valid reconnaissance permission, prospecting right, permission to remove, mining right, mining permit, retention permit, technical co-operation permit, reconnaissance permit, exploration right or production right (as applicable); and(c) providing the landowner or lawful occupier of the land at least 21 days’ written notice”
In essence, illegal mining under this Act refers to any prospecting or mining activity conducted without the required authorisation, rights, or permits; or without adhering to the procedural notice obligations.
This means individuals or entities engaging in mining, removing minerals or any related operations without the necessary legal approvals are in contravention of Section 5A, constituting an illegal mining activity under South African law.
Outside of the actual mining without the necessary permission and permits, numerous secondary criminal offences often committed by, and now closely associated with, Zama Zamas in South Africa and with illegal mining syndicates across the continent:
· Trespassing on active or abandoned mining properties
· Theft of ore, machinery, fuel and/or cables
· Illegal Diversion and Wastage of Water Resources during drought periods, notably in 2016 when Zama Zamas were found to be diverting thousands of kilolitres daily for gold processing, worsening local shortages
· Ecological destruction, including river contamination, deforestation and ground instability caused by unregulated excavation and toxic material runoff
· Sabotage of infrastructure to access underground shafts
· Money Laundering through informal gold trade and cash-based networks to evade detection
· Bribery and Corruption involving law enforcement officials, local authorities and/or government personnel
· Illegal Immigration facilitated through South Africa’s (and more broadly, Africa’s) porous borders
· Dealing of Illegal Weapons and Explosives often supplied by organised criminal syndicates
· Smuggling of minerals and participation in broader illicit trade networks
· Human trafficking and forced labour involving the exploitation of undocumented migrants, women and children
· Murder, violence and intimidation linked to territorial control and criminal enforcement within syndicate operations
Illegal Mining in South Africa: The Rise of the Zama Zamas
The Roots of Illegal Mining in South Africa
Illegal mining in South Africa has its roots in the socio-economic shifts that followed South Africa’s gold rush era in Witwatersrand 1886 and subsequent industrial decline from the 1970s onward in the South African mining sector and the inherent risks involved.
As the country transitioned politically and economically in the 1990’s, numerous mining operations were shut down or placed under care and maintenance. In many cases, mine shafts were left unrehabilitated and poorly secured. This created a vacuum that allowed unemployed former miners, displaced community members and undocumented migrants to enter these abandoned sites to extract residual minerals by hand or using improvised tools.
The phenomenon highlights a broader socio-economic issue: high unemployment and the lack of viable post-mining land-use planning in affected communities. It also underscores the intersection between poverty, resource dependency and security risk. Modern mine operators now need to confront illegal mining through a far-reaching, integrated intelligence, surveillance, enterprise risk and reporting solution.
What began as survival-driven artisanal mining gradually evolved into a complex, criminally organised underground economy. These syndicates now have the means to fund tools, vehicles and weapons, and in some regions even rival legitimate operations in scale.
According to anthropologist Rosalind Morris, director-producer of We Are Zama Zama (OkayAfrica, 2025), “There are about 6,100 closed mines in South Africa, many with several shafts, and Zama Zamas tend to ply their trade in those closed shafts.” She notes that “these informal miners now rival the formal mining sector in numbers, with tens of thousands engaged in illegal mining — perhaps even more than the roughly 30,000 people employed in the formal sector.”
How Data Warned of the Criminal Evolution of Illegal Mining in South Africa
While the public may only have recently become aware of the problems caused by Zama Zamas through news reports, researchers and data analysts have been warning about their rise for years. Studies of abandoned mine rehabilitation sites, such as The Impact of Artisanal Mining on Rehabilitation Efforts in the Sutherland Goldfield by Mhlongo and Amponsah-Dacosta, published in the Journal of Disaster Risk Studies in 2019, identified clear warning signs. Rising unemployment in mining regions, unrehabilitated mine shafts and weak enforcement mechanisms were creating ideal conditions for illegal mining to expand.
The study cautioned that without coordinated intervention, artisanal mining would evolve into organised, criminally driven operations posing escalating risks to human safety, the environment and the broader mining economy.
The Buffelsfontein Mine incident of January 2025 tragically confirmed these warnings. After months trapped underground, at least 78 miners lost their lives in one of the deadliest illegal mining incidents in South Africa’s history. The disaster exposed how deeply entrenched illegal mining networks have become within abandoned mines and how criminal syndicates now control and exploit these operations. What researchers once described as a foreseeable risk has now materialised, transforming a localised mining issue into a national crisis with severe humanitarian, environmental and reputational consequences for the industry.
The Zama Zamas have since become synonymous with violent organised crime in South Africa’s mining sector, but this pattern is not unique to the country. Across Africa, similar transitions have taken place as artisanal mining has evolved into highly organised, transnational networks that exploit both people and resources.
Established South African Mines and the Reputational Impact of Illegal Mining
The impact of Zama Zamas extends far beyond economic losses and safety risks. For established mining companies, the rise of illegal mining in South Africa represents not only a significant security challenge but also a reputational and operational threat.
High-profile incidents such as the Buffelsfontein Mine tragedy (and the ensuing internationally covered “Hunt for Tiger”) have blurred public perceptions between formal and informal mining. Even when illegal miners operate on or near abandoned or non-core mine sites, the resulting fatalities, environmental damage, community impact and/or violent clashes can undermine brand credibility and invite scrutiny from regulators, investors and surrounding communities.
According to PwC SA Mine 2025, mining companies are increasingly under pressure to manage the broader social and environmental consequences of their operations, particularly through “structured, environmentally responsible mine decommissioning and closure protocols—paired with meaningful rehabilitation.” The report argues that transforming disused or abandoned mine sites into productive community spaces (such as agriculture or renewable energy projects) not only reduces illegal mining risks but also demonstrates visible operational and social accountability, safeguarding long-term investor trust and ESG performance.
CiiMS enables operators to address these challenges through enhanced incident traceability, data-driven reporting, and integrated collaboration across departments and mine sites. By consolidating field reports, security data, and environmental alerts into a single platform, mines can differentiate internal from external incidents, communicate verified information to stakeholders, and maintain transparent compliance documentation that demonstrates proactive and responsible risk management.
The Economic Cost of Illegal Mining in South Africa
Illegal mining is not only a criminal and safety concern but also a direct economic threat to South Africa’s formal mining industry, which remains one of the country’s largest GDP contributors.
According to the Minerals Council South Africa 2025 Fact Sheet, the sector generated R443 billion in direct GDP value, supported 473,000 direct jobs and contributed R117 billion in taxes and royalties.
This legitimate economic engine contrasts sharply with the R20 billion to R60 billion lost annually through illegal mining, gold smuggling and clandestine mineral sales. These losses erode corporate revenues, tax collections and community investments while diverting funds into proliferating criminal networks.
Zama Zamas also fuel surrounding community crime, extortion, trafficking and violence. According to Sibanye-Stillwater, these syndicate-linked crimes impose additional costs on mines, including expanded community safety interventions, heightened private security deployment and increased insurance exposure. These indirect costs compound the financial impact that illegal mining has on the formal sector (Sibanye-Stillwater, 2024 Factsheet).
PwC’s SA Mine analysis warns that without renewed investment, South Africa’s gold industry may have fewer than 30 years of viable production left, underscoring how fragile the remaining value of the sector has become.
Illegal mining undermines the very industry it parasitises by damaging infrastructure, disrupting production and driving away investor confidence that fuels formal employment and growth. The longer these parallel economies operate unchecked, the deeper their impact on South Africa’s fiscal stability, regional security and reputation as a responsible mining jurisdiction.
Intelligence Systems as an Economic Safeguard: A Data-Driven Illegal Mining Solution
Illegal mining does not only threaten the safety of miners and communities; it also damages essential infrastructure such as roads, rail networks and power lines that support legitimate operations and their surrounding communities. Cable theft, pipeline tampering and unregulated excavation disrupt electricity and transport systems, causing production delays and repair costs that ripple through the economy. According to the Minerals Council South Africa, these disruptions contribute to billions of rands in annual losses across the mining value chain.
CiiMS enables the mitigation of these risks by transforming fragmented site-level data into actionable insight. Through centralised reporting, mines can identify patterns of theft, sabotage or smuggling early and implement targeted responses before losses escalate. CiiMS integrates incident management, analytics and audit-ready reporting to create transparency across operations, allowing companies to distinguish between criminal activity, operational faults and external infrastructure damage.
By adopting intelligence-led systems, the industry can reduce operational losses, safeguard infrastructure and strengthen coordination between security, engineering and law enforcement teams. This proactive approach not only protects assets but also builds investor confidence and supports a safer, more sustainable mining economy.
RSA Government Crackdown and Policy Alignment: Operation Vala Umgodi
In early 2025, the South African government intensified its nationwide efforts to combat illegal mining through the continued rollout of Operation Vala Umgodi, a multidisciplinary initiative targeting illicit mining operations and related organised crime. According to SA News (12 February 2025), more than 1 700 illegal miners were arrested between August 2024 and February 2025 in Stilfontein alone. Authorities also seized 458 firearms, 12 000 rounds of ammunition, 283 trucks, 303 vehicles, 84 pieces of heavy machinery, as well as R5 million in cash and uncut diamonds worth R32 million.
Yet the arrests also highlighted structural weaknesses within enforcement, a point underscored when four police officers were detained for allegedly aiding the escape of illegal mining kingpin, Neo James “Tiger” Tsoaeli.
In August 2025, DW Reported on a sweeping operation resulted in the detention of nearly 1,000 foreign nationals accused of illegal mining in the Barberton region, highlighting the scale of the cross-border dimension of the crisis and the increasing pressure on South Africa’s enforcement agencies. This case underscores how illegal mining is not simply a domestic security issue but also a regional migration and labour challenge.
Operation Vala Umgodi now extends beyond mining shafts to include critical infrastructure protection, addressing the damage caused by illegal excavation, cable theft and fuel siphoning that disrupt mine operations and community services. The initiative has further established a national framework that aligns operational management, policing, defence, border management and environmental authorities, enabling a more coordinated enforcement response.
Policy Measures and Economic Alignment
Alongside enforcement, government leaders have begun exploring economic interventions to address mineral smuggling and market irregularities. Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister, Gwede Mantashe has expressed support for a potential export tax on raw chrome ore, describing it as “a blunt instrument” if used in isolation (Eyewitness News, 27 October 2025). He argues that while such a tax could help curb illegal mineral exports, it must be introduced alongside complementary measures such as stable electricity supply, corrected mining tariffs and improved smelter viability to strengthen the broader value chain.
Back in 2017, the Sowetan interviewed Mining analyst, David van Wyk, who suggests that a centralised mineral buying agency could further prevent the illegal flow of minerals out of the country. By consolidating mineral sales through a regulated national buyer, the state could monitor trade volumes, track export flows and reduce opportunities for illicit transactions.
Van Wyk was later interviewed by Newzroom Afrika in February 2025, where he reiterated the importance of structural reforms in mineral governance, arguing that without tighter state oversight and transparent trade mechanisms, illegal mining and smuggling would continue to undermine South Africa’s resource economy (Newzroom Afrika, 2025).
Such policy proposals highlight a growing recognition that enforcement alone cannot solve the illegal mining crisis. Long-term stability depends on integrating economic regulation with data-driven monitoring and intelligence tools. For initiatives like Operation Vala Umgodi to succeed, they must be paired with systems that can link incidents, track criminal networks and monitor progress in real time across many sites and large remote areas.
CiiMS bridges this policy-to-practice gap by providing a unified digital framework that tracks production, sales and transport data while also consolidating field reports, security incidents and environmental alerts. This gives decision-makers accurate information, operational visibility and analytical insight that allows enforcement teams to move from reactive policing to proactive prevention.
The Continental Nexus of Illegal Mining: Why Africa Needs Data-Led Intelligence Systems
Illegal mining is no longer a localised challenge but a continental crisis. Across Africa, artisanal operations have evolved into organised, transnational networks that exploit weak governance, porous borders and rising global demand for minerals. From Ghana’s goldfields to the cobalt pits of the DRC, these networks are reshaping the economic and environmental landscape of resource-rich nations.
Galamsey Mining in Ghana
In Ghana, Galamsey groups that once consisted of small collectives of local gold panners have evolved into organised operations backed by foreign financiers, many from China and neighbouring West African countries. What began as a subsistence activity has grown into a commercial enterprise that operates outside state regulation and environmental oversight.
These miners now use heavy machinery such as excavators and dredgers and rely on mercury to process gold, causing severe pollution to rivers like the Pra, Ankobra and Offin. Farmlands have been left infertile and fishing communities displaced According to African Mining Market (2025), the rapid rise in global gold prices has only intensified these operations, with mine operators in West Africa now using drones to monitor illegal miners and protect concession areas.
This shift toward aerial surveillance aligns closely with how several CiiMS clients have adopted similar tactics within the platform’s intelligence framework. By integrating live drone feeds and geospatial data into CiiMS’ incident management and analytics modules, operators can detect unauthorised activity, map illegal mining routes and coordinate targeted responses across vast and remote areas. This approach allows mines to gather critical intelligence and monitor inaccessible terrain without putting security personnel in harm’s way, significantly reducing risk during inspections and field verification.
The system’s ability to consolidate environmental alerts, security reports and drone imagery into a single dashboard enables faster decision-making and evidence-based reporting to both corporate and regulatory stakeholders. It also enhances collaboration between mine operators, law enforcement and environmental agencies, creating a more coordinated response to illegal mining activity.
Government interventions including Operation Vanguard, Operation Halt and Operation Galamstop have struggled to contain the problem. Despite repeated enforcement efforts, Galamsey has become economically entrenched within rural communities where few employment alternatives exist. The practice has also been linked to child labour, unsafe working conditions and cross-border smuggling into neighbouring Burkina Faso and Côte d’Ivoire.
The situation in Ghana illustrates how informal mining can expand into a transnational economy sustained by illicit funding, poverty and weak institutional oversight, reflecting a broader continental pattern that connects West Africa’s gold corridors to the conflict-affected Sahel.
How the Sahel’s Gold Fields Fund Conflict
Across the Sahel, illegal gold mining has become a lifeline for communities and a source of power for armed groups. In Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, thousands of unregulated mining sites operate beyond state control in areas where insurgencies and political instability are already burdening the nations. These zones have become strongholds for criminal and militant groups that extract revenue through taxation, protection rackets or direct involvement in mining and smuggling operations.
Gold extracted from these informal sites is rarely processed locally. It is moved along covert routes through Niger, Chad and Mauritania, and across permeable borders into Sudan and Libya, where it is laundered into regional and international markets. From there, it often reaches refineries in the Middle East or Europe, entering legitimate supply chains without traceability. The profits from illicit mining have turned gold into a currency of conflict across the region.
In February 2025, a mine collapse near Kéniéba, Mali killed at least 48 informal miners, many of them women and children. The incident underscored the human cost of unregulated mining and its entanglement with economic desperation.
In northern Nigeria, armed groups have adopted similar tactics, using illegal mining in Zamfara and Kaduna as an income stream to support banditry and violence. Chad and Sudan serve as both transit and extraction hubs, where gold revenues intersect with arms trafficking and human smuggling networks. The vulnerable desert borders of Libya further facilitate these movements, providing access to global trade routes that connect Africa’s illicit gold to foreign markets.
The repercussions extend far beyond security. Environmental devastation from unregulated mining has intensified deforestation, drought and land degradation across one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable regions. The convergence of poverty, weak governance and rich mineral reserves has created an economy of survival; one that enriches warlords and criminal groups far more than the men, women and children who dig the gold from the ground.
Illegal mining in the Sahel is no longer a marginal activity. It has evolved into a pillar of regional instability, sustaining conflict, undermining governance and trapping entire communities in cycles of poverty and violence. It has the power to perpetuate cycles of poverty that drive new generations to the same perilous and criminal trade. (ENACT Africa, 2020)
Creuseurs in The Democratic Republic of Congo
In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Creuseurs work in cobalt and coltan pits that are deeply embedded in organised criminal networks. According to a 2022 ENACT Africa study, “illegal mining in the DRC is controlled by sophisticated criminal networks involving armed groups, traffickers, and corrupt officials.” These operations extend beyond national borders as minerals are “smuggled and laundered through formal export channels, feeding global supply chains.” At the time of the study’s publication, researchers found that 90 percent of the DRC’s minerals were extracted by Creuseurs, and that artisanal mining accounted for up to 60 percent of global coltan output, much of it sourced from illegal operations.
The study identified seven dimensions of transnational organised crime linked to coltan extraction in the DRC:
1. Illegal mining
2. Corruption
3. Counterfeiting
4. Fronting and collusion by Congolese actors
5. Smuggling
6. Resource predation by neighbouring states and cross-border actors
7. Armed group financing
The economic cost of illegal mining in the DRC is equally severe. According to the Wilson Center (2025), the country’s cobalt sector loses close to 1 billion US dollars annually through unregulated extraction, smuggling and export fraud. These losses contribute to the continent’s estimated 3.8 billion US dollars in annual illegal mining-related losses, equivalent to roughly one percent of Africa’s GDP. Such figures reveal the vast scale of economic harm caused by illegal mineral trade networks, which deprive governments of tax revenue, weaken governance and sustain criminal activity across borders with no sign of slowing down.
Each example reflects the same trajectory: informal, subsistence mining transforming into an organised shadow economy tied to smuggling, corruption and violence. The South African experience with Zama Zamas is therefore part of a broader continental challenge, one driven by poverty and further defined by weak governance coupled with vast untapped mineral wealth that together create ideal conditions for criminal exploitation.
From the Sahel to southern Africa, illegal mining now forms part of a transnational criminal ecosystem intertwined with trafficking, money laundering and arms smuggling. As the networks grow more sophisticated, they exploit regulatory loopholes, porous borders and data silos between enforcement agencies.
Addressing this crisis requires not only stronger law enforcement but also integrated intelligence and reporting systems; tools capable of connecting incidents, tracking patterns, and most importantly, enabling cross-border collaboration. This is where platforms such as CiiMS become crucial: by unifying data from multiple agencies and field reports, they allow governments and operators to trace illicit activity, visualise risk, and use this data to disrupt criminal economies before they escalate.
As the country’s mining sector continues to confront theft, smuggling and operational sabotage, it’s clear that conventional security measures can’t keep up. Combating illegal mining now requires smarter, intelligence-led tools like CiiMS. This new-age innovation is required to help mines track incidents, analyse patterns and coordinate responses across operations, law enforcement and local communities. Using a combination of CiiMS Ops, CiiMS Intel, CiiMS Risk, CiiMS GO and Signal Tower entities have the power to make meaningful change in the spectrum of illegal mining.
How CiiMS and Signal Tower Empower Mining Security and Intelligence
Illegal mining has shifted from a localised security nuisance into a sophisticated criminal economy that spans provinces, borders and mineral types. As the examples across South Africa, Ghana, the Sahel and the DRC show, these networks adapt quickly, exploit information gaps and thrive in environments where reporting, enforcement and operational visibility are fragmented or completely absent.
What operators and enforcement teams lack is not expertise or commitment, but unified, intelligence-driven visibility. This is where CiiMS and Signal Tower, working together, create meaningful change.
A Unified Intelligence Environment: CiiMS and Signal Tower
While CiiMS provides the operational backbone for incident, intelligence and risk management, Signal Tower extends those capabilities into real-time situational awareness and critical event monitoring. In regions where illegal mining incidents escalate rapidly and often involve armed groups, explosives, cable cuts or infrastructure sabotage — control rooms need immediate clarity.
Signal Tower delivers it through live alerting, two-way communication, and integrations with CCTV, sensors, drone feeds, panic mechanisms and environmental triggers.
When used alongside CiiMS, every alert becomes part of a continuous intelligence loop:
alerts feed into incident records
incident trends inform risk dashboards
dashboards guide patrol deployment, investigations and enforcement partnerships
Together, CiiMS and Signal Tower create an integrated intelligence ecosystem that strengthens early warning, improves response coordination and helps mines stay ahead of criminal networks that rely on speed, secrecy and fragmented communication.
Core Capabilities: How CiiMS Transforms Mining Security and Response
1. Integrated Incident and Occurrence Management
CiiMS standardises reporting across all mine sites and security partners. Every intrusion, theft, sabotage attempt or suspicious activity is captured in a structured, auditable format and can be escalated automatically using intricate workflow capabilities.
Why it matters: Illegal mining thrives when incidents go unreported, unlinked or lost in emails.
2. Intelligence Management for Syndicate Disruption
The Intelligence Module captures and categorises critical information:
· informant tips
· syndicate profiles
· repeat hotspots
· modus operandi
· geographic links
· handler notes
Why it matters: Illegal mining is no longer opportunistic. Mines need tools that track patterns, link actors and surface networks.
3. GIS Mapping and Geolocation Integrated Tools
CiiMS plots incidents, patrol routes, shaft locations, hotspots and known access paths on a dynamic geospatial dashboard.
Why it matters: Illegal mining sprawls across remote terrain. Visibility saves lives, time and resources.
4. Workflow Automation and Escalation Procedures
Workflow Automation
CiiMS workflows ensure that every incident is systematically navigated through the full incident and investigation lifecycle. This includes initial capture, assessment, evidence collection, verification, case building and final closure. Each step is guided, timestamped and assigned to the correct role to ensure accountability, compliance and full traceability.
Escalation Procedures
Escalation rules ensure that key protocols and mandatory procedures are followed when dealing with high-risk or priority incidents. When a threshold event occurs, such as violence, equipment damage, access to restricted zones or signs of organised illegal mining, the system can be configured to escalate the incident to the designated supervisors, control rooms or external partners in line with organisational and regulatory protocols.
Why it matters: Illegal mining incidents can escalate within minutes. Clear workflows prevent investigative gaps, and structured escalation procedures ensure the right decision-makers intervene immediately. This combination reduces operational risk, protects personnel and prevents avoidable production losses.
5. Financial Impact Tracking
Losses from cable theft, fuel siphoning, sabotaged infrastructure, production delays and stolen ore are quantified in real time.
Why it matters: The mining sector loses billions across Africa every year. Quantifying the damage strengthens risk forecasting and board-level reporting.
6. Multi-System Collaboration and Integrations
CiiMS integrates with drone feeds, access control, telemetry systems, CCTV networks, intrusion sensors and external security partners already established at mine sites.
Why it matters: Illegal mining is multi-layered. Surveillance, intelligence and operations must speak to each other.
7. Mobile Field Reporting with CiiMS Go
Security teams, environmental units and investigators capture GPS-tagged reports, photos, videos and timestamps directly from the field. These can be captured using CiiMS’ mobile offering that will update to the system as soon as a connection is established. This means that field operatives can collect information in remote locations but still end up in the system without having to manually add them on a desktop system again after the fact.
Why it matters: Illegal mining is dynamic and mobile; your reporting system must be equally mobile and adaptable even across remote terrains.
8. A Proven Model for African Mining Security
Some of Africa’s largest mining groups (referenced anonymously) already use the CiiMS ecosystem to coordinate security operations, track intelligence, manage compliance and reduce losses across vast land portfolios.
Why it matters: CiiMS is not theoretical, it is an active solution delivering measurable impact today.
Book your demo today to see how it can be applied to your existing operational framework.
Conclusion
The future of mining security depends on integrated intelligence, not isolated interventions. CiiMS and Signal Tower equip operators with the tools to connect incidents, monitor risk in real time and respond with accuracy. With these systems in place, mines can strengthen governance, build investor confidence and create safer, more resilient operations across Africa’s mining industry and broader security landscape.
Sources:
1. African Mining Market (West Africa gold prices + drones)
2. AP News – SA mining output & profits
3. DW News – 2025 Barberton arrests (1,000 detained)
4. ENACT Africa – Sahel gold mining as organised crime (2020)
5. ENACT Africa – DRC coltan/cobalt criminal networks (2022)
6. Eyewitness News – Mantashe on chrome export tax
7. Journal of Disaster Risk Studies (2019) – Sutherland Goldfield artisanal mining impact
8. Minerals Council South Africa – 2025 Fact Sheet (GDP, jobs, tax, losses)
9. Newzroom Afrika – David van Wyk interview (2025)
10. OkayAfrica – Rosalind Morris interview (We Are Zama Zama)
11. PwC – SA Mine 2023 report (30 years of gold left)
12. SA News – Operation Vala Umgodi stats (Feb 2025)
13. Sibanye-Stillwater – 2024 Illegal Mining Fact Sheet (community impact + indirect costs)
14. Sowetan – David van Wyk 2017 commentary on mineral buying agency
15. Wilson Center – Economic losses from illegal mining (DRC, cobalt + USD 1bn loss)
16. South Africa Government Gazette – Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) Section 5A
17. Mhlongo & Amponsah-Dacosta (2019) – Disaster Risk Studies journal article
18. OkayAfrica Film Feature – We Are Zama Zama documentary
19. Additional: Buffelsfontein incident summaries (2025) https://www.dw.com
